NPS and survey analysis
Ceven reads every NPS and survey response across your tools, groups the themes, and drafts a cited brief with suggested follow-ups your team approves before acting.
Survey results that get counted but never read
Survey programs are good at producing a number and bad at producing understanding. The score gets charted and reported, but the free-text comments, where the real reasons live, pile up faster than anyone can read them closely. Responses arrive across several tools at once, and reading them all would mean opening each platform and scrolling through hundreds of open-ended answers by hand. So the comments get skimmed, a few vivid quotes get pulled for a slide, and the rest goes unread. Worse, a detractor who left a specific, fixable complaint often gets no follow-up at all, because no one connected that response back to the account it came from. The feedback was collected, but the signal inside it was never actually extracted or acted on.
How the workflow reads and synthesizes the feedback
You describe what you want to learn in plain language, and Ceven builds a workflow that gathers responses wherever they land. It pulls NPS and survey data from Delighted, SurveyMonkey, and Typeform, and joins each response to its account context in Salesforce and any related tickets in Zendesk. An AI step reads every comment, groups them into themes, and separates the recurring, structural feedback from the one-off remarks. The result is a cited brief that names the top themes, quotes representative responses, and links each theme back to the accounts and tickets behind it, so a claim can always be traced to its source. That brief is posted to the team in Slack, and specific fixable complaints are flagged for follow-up with the account they came from. The raw responses stay in the survey tools that collected them; Ceven reads and synthesizes rather than relocating the data.
Follow-ups wait for a decision
Turning a detractor comment into an action is where a person steps in. When the analysis flags a response that deserves a reply, Ceven drafts the follow-up and holds it at an approval gate rather than messaging the customer directly. The account owner reads the comment in context, decides whether and how to respond, and can adjust the draft or set it aside. This keeps a raw, emotional piece of feedback from triggering an automated reply that makes things worse. Once approved, the response and the survey comment that prompted it are recorded to an exportable audit trail, so the loop from feedback to action is documented. The reading and grouping are automatic; the customer contact stays a human call.
Putting it to work
You can start free with no credit card, connect your survey and account tools, and describe the questions you want each round of feedback to answer. Ceven builds the analysis workflow across its library of more than a thousand tools, so one run can read Delighted, SurveyMonkey, and Typeform, join to Salesforce and Zendesk, and deliver a cited brief in Slack. Ceven is never the system of record, so your survey platforms keep the raw responses and your CRM keeps the account relationship. If you want the themes tracked over time, Ceven can host a no-code dashboard that updates each survey cycle. Run after run, the same workflow turns raw responses into understanding your team can actually act on, with every conclusion traceable back to the comments behind it.
Frequently asked
Does it reply to survey respondents automatically?
No. Ceven drafts any follow-up and holds it at an approval gate, so the account owner decides what reaches the customer. The reading and analysis are automatic; the outreach is not.
Which tools does it pull from?
It connects across more than a thousand tools, including Delighted, SurveyMonkey, Typeform, Salesforce, and Zendesk, so it can read responses from every survey source and join them to account context.
Where do our survey responses live?
In your survey tools. Ceven reads and synthesizes the responses but leaves them in the platforms that collected them, so it never becomes the system of record, and every run is written to an exportable audit trail.
Can it tie a comment back to the account?
Yes. Each response is joined to its account context and related tickets, and the cited brief links every theme back to the specific responses and accounts behind it, so a finding can always be traced to its source.
Related use cases
Customer health scoring
Ceven combines product usage, support history, and billing signals into a single health score per account, then drafts the follow-up your success team approves.
Review and reputation monitoring
Ceven pulls new reviews from every site into one queue, drafts a reply for each, and holds them for a human to approve before they post.
Support ticket triage and deflection
Ceven reads incoming support tickets, classifies and routes them, and drafts replies for the routine ones that an agent approves before anything reaches a customer.