AI agents for local government
Permit intake classification, zoning and setback checks, and FOIA response handling. Built for the long tail of cities and counties not big enough for enterprise sales.
Systems of record this works alongside
Starter workflows
Permit intake classification
Inbound permit application classifies into the right type (building, electrical, plumbing, special use). The agent runs the zoning and setback checks against the parcel and routes for the planner's review.
FOIA response generation
When a public records request comes in, the agent searches the document corpus, drafts the response with the redactions per the public-records law, and routes for the clerk's approval before release.
Notice of violation drafting
Code enforcement violations get drafted with the legal basis, the property record, and the cure deadline. The code officer reviews and posts.
Council packet assembly
Per meeting, assemble the agenda, the staff reports, the minutes, and the supporting documents. Distribute to council members on the timeline the open-meetings law requires.
The long tail of small cities the enterprise vendors do not call on
Cities and counties under fifty thousand residents are too small for enterprise sales motions and too overworked to RFP a custom build. They mostly run Tyler Munis or EnerGov, and the staff inside has to make those systems work without the implementation partner the bigger jurisdictions get. The agents fit exactly that gap. They take the routine work that should never have eaten the city clerk's day, and they leave the policy work to the clerk.
Frequently asked
Does the agent decide on permit applications?
No. It classifies, runs the standard checks, and surfaces the recommendation. The planner or building official decides. Discretionary decisions stay with the human.
What about FOIA timelines, those are statutory?
The agent fires the response draft within the statutory window and surfaces the deadline to the clerk. The clerk approves and releases.